Unlicensed Driving California VC 15210 (P)(8)

My question involves a driver's license issued by the State of: California

Ok, let me establish my intentions, as many people seem to go off on 'sovereign citizen' stuff just because someone wants to challenge the DMV or traffic laws. I want to follow the laws, and it appears that there is exculpatory code available to people who are interested in using the roads without a license.

I am keenly interested in being able to drive a car with no license or registration, I am in no way interested in violating the law or saying that I am a sovereign or any thing else that is illegal, so please remember I'm not trying to 'get away' with anything, but I would like to be free of the DMV, and I don't dispute that one needs a license to drive a Motor Vehicle, but I can find no evidence that one needs a license to travel in the vehicle.

CA VC provides a definition for Motor Vehicle (CA VC 415) as well as Vehicle (CA VC 670). Yet DMV only provides registration for Motor Vehicle's (CA VC 4000a). Also CA VC 15210 (p)(8) provides that 'in the absence of a federal definition, definitions of this code shall apply.' So I read that to mean that the CA VC definitions for Motor Vehicle and Vehicle don't apply since there are Federal Definitions for both of those words.

The Federal Definitions are more favorable, and more precise for both the term 'Motor Vehicle (18 U.S.C. 31 (6), the term 'Vehicle' is defined at 1 U.S.C. section 4.

My question is this, why would someone need a license to drive a 'Vehicle' if their car is not a 'Motor Vehicle?'

Thanks

Unlicensed Driving California VC 15210 (P)(8)