My question involves labor and employment law for the state of: California
I was denied UI because I'm not available for work. However, I am available.
I am coming off of disability. During the interview I was given 48 hours to have the doctor's office fax a note stating that I can work.
That fax was sent within 3 hours. The note stated that I can work as of the date of the fax, which is 1/19/16.
I suspect that there are two possible reasons that I was denied.
1. Even though the fax was sent on a timely basis, somehow the adjudicator (is that the right word?) did not receive it.
2. The UI application was from the middle of December, so the "as of" date stated by the doctor of 1/19 was taken to mean that I wasn't available in December.
When I appeal, obviously I will submit the doctor's fax. The question is, should I get another letter from the doctor clarifying the "as of" date? If so, please suggest the words that she should use.
Any other insights would be appreciated.
I was denied UI because I'm not available for work. However, I am available.
I am coming off of disability. During the interview I was given 48 hours to have the doctor's office fax a note stating that I can work.
That fax was sent within 3 hours. The note stated that I can work as of the date of the fax, which is 1/19/16.
I suspect that there are two possible reasons that I was denied.
1. Even though the fax was sent on a timely basis, somehow the adjudicator (is that the right word?) did not receive it.
2. The UI application was from the middle of December, so the "as of" date stated by the doctor of 1/19 was taken to mean that I wasn't available in December.
When I appeal, obviously I will submit the doctor's fax. The question is, should I get another letter from the doctor clarifying the "as of" date? If so, please suggest the words that she should use.
Any other insights would be appreciated.
Denial & Appeals: Denied UI for Not Being Available for Work Even Though I Am Available
Aucun commentaire:
Enregistrer un commentaire