My question involves civil rights in the State of: South Dakota
-------------------------
"Has not been found in the previous ten years to be a "danger to others" or a "danger to self" as defined in SDCL 27A-1-1"
(7) "Danger to self,"
(a) A reasonable expectation that the person will inflict serious physical injury upon himself or herself in the near future, due to a severe mental illness, as evidenced by the person's treatment history and the person's recent acts or omissions which constitute a danger of suicide or self-inflicted serious physical injury. Such acts may include a recently expressed threat if the threat is such that, if considered in the light of its context or in light of the person's recent previous acts or omissions, it is substantially supportive of an expectation that the threat will be carried out; or
-------------------------
Theoretically, if someone living in this state saw a psychologist and a neuropsychologist (hereafter Psy and N.Psy) and the N.Psy wrote in his/her notes based on a single visit and that visit's tests, '[...] depression, suicidal ideation, and [...] to where his/her access to guns needs to be curtailed,' would that someone meet the criteria for not being allowed a concealed carry permit? Would that someone have any grounds for fighting it?
Note: that someone expressed no suicidal intent, and the Psy who has been seen for a year disagrees with the N.Psy who was seen only once.
-------------------------
"Has not been found in the previous ten years to be a "danger to others" or a "danger to self" as defined in SDCL 27A-1-1"
(7) "Danger to self,"
(a) A reasonable expectation that the person will inflict serious physical injury upon himself or herself in the near future, due to a severe mental illness, as evidenced by the person's treatment history and the person's recent acts or omissions which constitute a danger of suicide or self-inflicted serious physical injury. Such acts may include a recently expressed threat if the threat is such that, if considered in the light of its context or in light of the person's recent previous acts or omissions, it is substantially supportive of an expectation that the threat will be carried out; or
-------------------------
Theoretically, if someone living in this state saw a psychologist and a neuropsychologist (hereafter Psy and N.Psy) and the N.Psy wrote in his/her notes based on a single visit and that visit's tests, '[...] depression, suicidal ideation, and [...] to where his/her access to guns needs to be curtailed,' would that someone meet the criteria for not being allowed a concealed carry permit? Would that someone have any grounds for fighting it?
Note: that someone expressed no suicidal intent, and the Psy who has been seen for a year disagrees with the N.Psy who was seen only once.
Hindrance of Civil Rights: Suicidal Ideation and Concealed Carry Permit
Aucun commentaire:
Enregistrer un commentaire