I would argue what is the purpose of the sign? If a sign said girls in mini-skirts cannot walk on this premises, it would be unenforceable. If a sign said four cylinder vehicles cannot park in that lot, it would unenforceable. On the same note, why can't a car back into a 90 degree parking stall? If it's for tow-away capabilities, it makes no sense because a large percentage of vehicles are front wheel drive.
I drive a full size truck and I can only fit into most stalls by backing into it. Furthermore, I rarely see a lot with 90 degree parking require head-in only. It can be required for angled parking stalls but that is different because of traffic flow and safety purposes.
As said, the sign has no purpose except for a small portion of that lot. Therefore, I would argue that the sign is invalid. Again, a novice could not ague this and win, but IMO a skilled trial lawyer could.
I drive a full size truck and I can only fit into most stalls by backing into it. Furthermore, I rarely see a lot with 90 degree parking require head-in only. It can be required for angled parking stalls but that is different because of traffic flow and safety purposes.
As said, the sign has no purpose except for a small portion of that lot. Therefore, I would argue that the sign is invalid. Again, a novice could not ague this and win, but IMO a skilled trial lawyer could.
It Should Always be Legal to Back Into Parking Spaces
Aucun commentaire:
Enregistrer un commentaire