My question involves restraining orders in the State of: Minnesota
Section 3B states:
Respondent must not have any contact with the Protected Person(s) whether in person, with or through other persons, by phone, mail,email through electronic devices, social media, or by any other means except as follows No exceptions
1. I said it was OK to have her family contact me and relay messages (how else is she to get her items, and other agreed upon situations stated, example she is an employee in this building as I am, so I authorized provisions for her to work here on certain days, which are days I will be gone)
2. That is for her, can I myself use a 3rd party.
regarding #1. I did not authorize this, but the box is checked. Can I disregard that part? Sadly it is the weekend, so correcting it will be difficult, and she was just evicted 12hrs ago.
thank you for any attention in this matter.
the purpose of this RO, is to keep her away from the building (upsetting tenants through her volitile behavior) and very aggressive and violent towards me (also affecting our pets). Talking is not usually an issue anyways, but in this case, a 3rd party would be better as s/he would act as a moderator of sourts.
Regardless - I did not authorize that box to be checked. Hearing is the 19th.
Section 3B states:
Respondent must not have any contact with the Protected Person(s) whether in person, with or through other persons, by phone, mail,email through electronic devices, social media, or by any other means except as follows No exceptions
1. I said it was OK to have her family contact me and relay messages (how else is she to get her items, and other agreed upon situations stated, example she is an employee in this building as I am, so I authorized provisions for her to work here on certain days, which are days I will be gone)
2. That is for her, can I myself use a 3rd party.
regarding #1. I did not authorize this, but the box is checked. Can I disregard that part? Sadly it is the weekend, so correcting it will be difficult, and she was just evicted 12hrs ago.
thank you for any attention in this matter.
the purpose of this RO, is to keep her away from the building (upsetting tenants through her volitile behavior) and very aggressive and violent towards me (also affecting our pets). Talking is not usually an issue anyways, but in this case, a 3rd party would be better as s/he would act as a moderator of sourts.
Regardless - I did not authorize that box to be checked. Hearing is the 19th.
Violation & Enforcement: 3rd Party Mistake in Oop
Aucun commentaire:
Enregistrer un commentaire