Evidence: Is the MUTCD Binding on the States as a Contract

Quote:

---

Quoting joef

---

Brian, PayrolGuy is right no matter how much you do not want to believe the facts.
MUTCD is not law. It is the manual for roadway signs and markings written and distributed by US DOT for states to adopt to give consistent signage and road markings nationwide. It is adopted by individual states, with or without modification, generally by reference, for how their roads are marked. It is up to individual states to decide if incorrect signage make signs unenforceable if their intent is clear.

---

When States choose to follow the standards in the MUTCD, or adopt their own standards such as the CA MUTCD, this agreement is probably done on a written contract. Yes? When this agreement is established between a State and the Federal Govt, can a Traffic Judge disregard that agreement/contract and make other non-conforming signs enforceable in their courtroom? If so, that seems like a breach of contract?

By allowing the above post to remain I would assume you feel the courts can enforce any type of sign they feel like enforcing...as long as it is legible?

Evidence: Is the MUTCD Binding on the States as a Contract