My question involves a traffic ticket from the state of: CA
Police agency responded to my Informal Discovery Request. Under "names & address of prosecution witnesses," police agency put "none."
Shouldn't my citing officer have been named as a witness?
"Whether or not the People provide a prosecuting attorney, the citing officer who testifies as to the circumstances of the citation is a witness, no more, no less."
People v. Marcroft (1992) 6 Cal.App.4th Supp. 1 , 8 Cal.Rptr.2d 544
Basis for a motion to suppress citing officer's testimony, or more like just a small error that a judge would overlook?
Police agency responded to my Informal Discovery Request. Under "names & address of prosecution witnesses," police agency put "none."
Shouldn't my citing officer have been named as a witness?
"Whether or not the People provide a prosecuting attorney, the citing officer who testifies as to the circumstances of the citation is a witness, no more, no less."
People v. Marcroft (1992) 6 Cal.App.4th Supp. 1 , 8 Cal.Rptr.2d 544
Basis for a motion to suppress citing officer's testimony, or more like just a small error that a judge would overlook?
Speeding Tickets: Informal Discovery Disclosure: Prosecutorial Witnesses
Aucun commentaire:
Enregistrer un commentaire