Offered Choice of Ammender Infraction. Which to Choose

My question involves a traffic ticket from the state of: WA

I was cited for failure to stop at a stop sign.

Via email I've negotiated to ammend the infraction to a non-moving violation in hopes this will keep my insurance from going up. The prosecutor has offered me my choice of either expired tabs or violation of the seatbelt statute with a penalty of $136.

Any reason I'm not aware of to choose one over the other?

I figure either:
1) It doesn't matter.
2) Maybe the seatbelt one could still hurt my insurance so I'll choose the tabs.

Thanks in advance for any help.

For the record, I'm ineligible for a deferred.

(Replying because I forgot to subscribe to this thread.)

Offered Choice of Ammender Infraction. Which to Choose