Trespassing: Trespassing Behind a Fence Unlawfully Placed in the Row

My question involves criminal law for the state of: CO

To the NAZI loser who feels the need to close my previous thread on said subject, could you please describe why you felt you needed to silence such a conversation, other than an immature decision because you just didn't like how the conversation was going? Come on, BE PROFESSIONAL and stop silencing shit. What forum policy have I violated? Please elaborate.

The reason I have a problem with what you did, is because I was in the middle of getting to the bottom of what I believe the issue at hand is. Here is my final post regarding said subject, BECAUSE I THINK THE PUBLIC NEEDS TO BE TALKING ABOUT THIS SORT OF THING, ESPECIALLY IN A FREAKING LEGAL FORUM. STOP SILENCING THE VERY TALK YOU OPENED UP YOUR FORUM FOR!!!!!

Quote:

---

Quoting jk

---

in your case it can be assumed that if you didn’t have the key to the lock on the gate the owner has not granted you permission to be inside the fence. As such, the cops can arrest you on suspicion of trespassing.

---

You seem to keep getting ahead of yourself. How do the cops know it's private property? How do they know some owner of said alleged private property has not granted said permission to be inside of it? Just the mere existence of the fence? How do the cops know the property owner who they think erected the fence, was in fact the person who erected said fence? You can't be assuming EVERY element of trespassing. You gotta have SOMETHING that resembles a fact or evidence to work with. A FENCE, alone, does not equal evidence of private property plus a private property owner's permission, because it could just as easily be evidence of a permission being revoked for public property. Another way to put it, considering I tested out a similar theory with great success, was where I got falsely arrested for not showing my receipt at a Walmart. The retarded cop who arrested me likely thought that not showing a receipt was evidence that I had not paid for my item, however obviously not showing a receipt, and nothing more is EQUALLY likely to be evidence that I simply don't want to show my receipt. At most, seeing an erected fence, and nothing more, just like witnessing somebody not show a receipt, and nothing more, requires FURTHER investigation to eliminate the possibility of innocence from that of guilt. And no, I don't think I should be held in the mean time if I don't show my receipt, for the cop and clerks to establish my innocence while going and looking me up on video footage / checking the registers, just like I don't think I should be held in the mean time, JUST TO CHECK THE STATUS OF THE PERMIT FOR THE FENCE. You may think, well, more people than not who don't show their receipt are more likely to be shoplifters. Sorry buddy, that's guilty until proven innocent, NAZI like mentality there. Just because a fence exists, you may also think that more likely than not the existence of that fence is legitimate. Nobody, or at least very few people, erect fences without a permit, right? However, the POSSIBILITY that the fence is illegitimately placed is still 50/50 compared to legitimately placed, without any further investigation on the part of the officers to differentiate between the two. They may have a hunch, which is great. So go follow up on that hunch! Don't assume the fence is up legally, just so I can sit in jail, just because you think some sort of "exigent" circumstance exists that you just "couldn't let your nigger go" and you had to arrest him before you could SIMPLY GO LOOK UP A FREAKING PERMIT FOR THE AREA. Sounds like a royal waste of tax payer dollars, and a pure infringement on my fourth amendment rights, in my opinion.

Trespassing: Trespassing Behind a Fence Unlawfully Placed in the Row